• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty/Staff Scholarship
    • College of Arts & Sciences
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty/Staff Scholarship
    • College of Arts & Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Island artificial bee colony for global optimization

    Thumbnail
    Date
    12/2/2020
    Author
    Abu Doush, Iyad
    Al-Betar, Mohammed
    Awadallah, Mohammed
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper proposes an efficient version of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm based on the island model concepts. The new version is called the island artificial bee colony (iABC) algorithm. It uses the structured population concept by applying the island model to improve the diversification capabilities of ABC. In the island model, the population is divided into a set of sub-populations called islands, each of which is manipulated separately by an independent variant of the ABC. After a predefined number of iterations, the islands exchange their solutions by migration. This process can help ABC in controlling the diversity of the population during the search process and thus improve the performance. The proposed iABC is evaluated using global optimization functions established by the IEEE-CEC 2015 which include 15 test functions with various dimensions and complexities (i.e., 10, 30, and 50). In order to evaluate the performance of iABC, various parameter settings are utilized to test the effectiveness of their convergence properties. Furthermore, the performance of iABC is compared against 19 comparative methods that used the same IEEE-CEC 2015 test functions. The results show that iABC produced better results when compared with ABC in all IEEE-CEC 2015 test functions, while the results of iABC better than those of the other island-based algorithm on almost all test functions. Furthermore, iABC is able to obtain three new results for three test functions better than all the comparative methods. Using Friedman test and Holm’s procedure, iABC is ranked third, seventh, and ninth out of 19 comparative methods for the test functions with 10, 30, 50 dimensionality, respectively.
    URI
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00500-020-04760-8
    https://dspace.auk.edu.kw/handle/11675/6701
    Collections
    • College of Arts & Sciences [569]

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2021  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by Atmire